there is a three-page introduction to the book. where babasaheb raised a few methodological questions on the historiography and iconography of buddha. he implied that historians of the buddhist study so far have not addressed the scientific and epistemological gaps while showcasing buddha's life events.
as we progress through the book chapter by chapter, it becomes a very reflective journey. not only does it unravel the societal phenomena that we encounter daily, but it extensively also brings a metaphysical view to the philosophy of buddhism vis-a-vis its meta-distortion by brahminism.
the book convinces us at the end that to understand buddhism in india, there are limitations to the textual and physical evidence. nonetheless, babasaheb supports the "scientific reconstruction" of history as one part of the inquiry. to fill the remaining gap, he also suggests that one could always go for another i.e. "experiential line of inquiry" through the practice of buddhism and mahasatipatthana.
while practicing the same, a reflection, which wasn't mentioned anywhere that i could assemble during mahasatipatana, was that buddha's transition while transcending into the realm of enlightenment is so very inspiring, any person could get a glimpse of it through its experience.
for buddha, 'dukkha' was an ultimate truth arising from 'desires'. thus, the simple remedy [for few but complex for many] to reduce the 'dukkha' is the reduction of desires, gradually, one by one.
desires could be that in the form of attachment as well. for example, for me, expecting the warmth of a friend all the time, especially during the occurrence of 'dukkha' was an attachment. till, the time i reduced the expectation, and desire for the attachment, the 'dukkha' of that particular attachment weathered away simultaneously.
"atah, deep, bhavah"_
📑 healing buddha_
🖋 @dnyanesh_____
12:30PM:17/08/21